I was in the Late Late Show audience last night. The show, on Irish television, is the longest running “chat” show in the world – we are told. I was invited on the basis of my being on the side of traditional marriage in the forthcoming debate on gay “marriage” which is going to begin raging in this jurisdiction soon.
One homosexual person on the panel, “married” with children, objected to the term gay being attached to their campaign for legislative change. He said that what their campaign was about was “marriage equality”. A strange signal hit my brain cells – like when someone says something entirely illogical but you cannot at once put your finger on the illogicality. Essentially the nerve-ending which was touched was the one which sent a signal to my brain when writing the last paragraph telling me again that when gay is used with the word marriage then that word marriage must be put in inverted commas – because as a compound noun, gay marriage does not, and cannot, exist if marriage is accepted as a bond between a man and a woman sharing rights which depend on their complimentary biological nature.
Marriage in this sense, the sense in which the marriage bond has been understood from time immemorial, has nothing essentially to do with love. A marriage contracted between a man and a woman may be loveless and it will still be a marriage. A marriage without the commitment to share the couple’s complimentary sexual faculties is not in the proper sense a marriage at all.
I thought to myself that there must be some logical formula which can unravel this fallacy? Perhaps this is it?
Current meaning of marriage: “biological man+ biological woman+(children)”. That’s it.
What the “marriage equality” campaign is proposing is the following: “biological man+ biological woman+(children)” = “biological man+ biological man+(children)” or “biological woman+ biological woman+(children)”.
Is this not patently false?
If you want to see the somewhat unbalanced discussion and experience first-hand the same brain trauma you can check it out at 1 hour sixteen minutes into the show.
4 thoughts on “Illogically induced brain trauma”
Thanks for the this. The abuse of language on this subject is indeed mind-blowing!
Pingback: Born to kill? « Garvan Hill
It’s in point of fact a great and helpful piece of information. I’m glad that you just shared this useful information with us.
Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for
Your means of telling all in this paragraph is in fact nice, all be capable of simply understand it, Thanks a lot.